TRUTH can mean many different things.
The old saying that truth is in the eye of the beholder is very apt.
The writer of the Corbyn Bashing letter has put his own slant on the events that took place many years ago.
Where was the actual evidence that the Iraq War was primarily to seize its oil reserves?
There is none, that was pure conjecture.
The writer seems obsessed with seizing other countries’ oil reserves as a motive for invasion.
That so-called truth is a prime example of the eye of the beholder syndrome.
In relation to the recent tragic events in Salisbury, he appears to have swallowed the Moscow version of events hook line and sinker.
I have to ask why photos of the Skripals would prove that they had been poisoned; here the writer uses that safe word allegedly in order that he can justify his own interpretation of events.
Mr Roberts uses this tragedy to claim that the media are hell-bent on Corbyn bashing.
There were many who automatically blamed Moscow and, when Corbyn justifiably called for caution, they jumped on him big time.
The Newsnight image was crass to say the least.
However, there are times when Jeremy does appear to be indecisive and one has to ask is that a quality that, as a Prime Minister, would stand him in good stead; or is my eye at fault here?
Ewen Simpson
Whatcroft
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here